Monthly Archives: February 2008

Real Life Olathe Investment Property Story: Part I

abacusBuckle down and get your calculators out because today and tomorrow I will tell the story of what is and what could have been.  All of this based on a real life example from an actual Olathe, Kansas investment property located about 22 miles southwest of downtown Kansas City.

Our Investment Property:  The investment property we are going to use as an example was a duplex purchased in whole in March of 1997.  Built in 1988, this 2 bedroom, 2 bath duplex is located in a nice middle class neighborhood in very much a growth oriented part of Kansas City.  So my guess is that appreciation here was a little stronger than it would have been in many areas of KC, though not as strong as it would have been if it had been located east of I-35.  So we have a fair income property to use. 

Some of the numbers include a purchase price in 1997 of $106,000.  It was bought after several months on the market so we know there wasn’t a bidding war for the property.   Today the property has been “split” meaning that the buyer of this property in 1997 was a fairly intelligent investor and knew that he could sell the pieces for more than the whole. 

It appears as though the 1997 buyer sold the first half in April of 2000 for $83,950 and the second half in December of 2001 for $85,950.  For reasons of edification, the county appraised value of each today is $96,400.  Though I believe you would sell each for $105,000.

I am very familiar with this un-named neighborhood because I also own a property within it’s HOA.  So all the numbers I’m using I’m very familiar with.  As Hollywood would say, “based on a true story.”

BossOy.  Chris.  You really can take a lot of time setting up situations.  Couldn’t you just tell us what you have to tell us and be done with it.  I have 5 other blogs I read and I only have just so much time before my boss asks me to do something…again!

Er, sorry. 

What if the buyer in 1997 had the same theory of thought that so many real estate investors have that it’s better to buy a good property and hold on to it forever because each year you get closer to having the mortgage paid off and you’ll then have cash flow for life? 

Well today we are going to tackle that question.  Tomorrow, we’ll see where the 1997 buyer actually went.  And then we’ll discuss a hypothetical on what would  have happened if he had done what I recommended to him to do. 

Note to all Hillary Clinton voters out there:  I’m using “HIM” because that’s what my teachers (women) taught me was proper English.  I fully recognize that the investor could have been a woman every bit as savvy as any man.  🙂

The Math On Our Olathe Investment Property
To be clear, we are calculating today’s worth if the investor had held on to this income property until today. 

Purchase Price      $106,000
Sales Price             $210,000
Sales Costs            $   14,700
Net Appreciation  $  89,300

Original financing (let’s just say he never refinanced) was 20% down ($21,200), closing costs paid by seller (an educated guess) and 7.5% interest (probably a little high) and fully amortized over 30 years. 

Loan balance at origination  $84,800
Loan balance after 11 years $71,951
Principal Reduction       $12,849

So let me see if I have this right.  With an initial investment of $21,200 the real estate investor in question now has equity in the property of $102,149.  Get your calculators out and tell me what the annual yield is.  I think you’ll find it somewhere just north of 16%.  Regardless, the gain in equity is nearly 4 times the initial investment…in only 11 years. 

articleimage.jpgWhoa.  Whoa.  Whoa.  Chris, once again you are forgetting a few things.  What about maintenance?  Like the fact that it needed new carpeting or that the walls needed painting and other such items.  You simply cannot discount those factors.

Oh, I agree 100%.  But how to figure those in?  I only have so much space, and as you said, you only have so much time before your boss comes back.  Because if you are going to make me start figuring all of those items I’m also going to have to figure in Cash Flow Before Taxes as well as what Depreciation would have done to your tax situation for all of those years.  (FYI:  Depreciation = Smile On Your Face)

Without actually seeing the investor’s tax sheets for the past 11 years I simply cannot be accurate down to $1,000.  But I can ask you to look at those numbers.  Do you like what you see?  It can be better.  Join us tomorrow and we’ll look at another scenario based on the 1997 purchase of this Olathe duplex. 

4 Comments

Filed under Olathe, Real Estate Investing

KC Blues: DC Bellamy Show A Winner

DC BellamyLast night my wife and I went on out to Marty’s Blues Cafe  in Merriam.  We went specifically to listen to DC Bellamy.  I’ve been a fan of his since I first heard his stuff on KKFI

Anyway, the show was fantastic.  The first time I’ve got to see him live.  He is a lot of fun and a very good singer.  I would urge you to go to his website and listen to a tune or two.   Buy his latest album.  Support the blues!

And if you go to Marty’s Blues Cafe for any other acts, be sure to get the quesadillas.  They were delicious. 

1 Comment

Filed under Kansas City entertainment

Predatory Borrowers Helped Create Mortgage Mess

Predatory Borrowers Helped Create Mortgage Mess
by Michelle Malkin
Kansas City Star – January 31, 2008

Who says bipartisanship is dead? From President Bush to Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards, to Mitt Romney and John McCain, virtually everyone in Washington agrees: The government must Do Something to stop home foreclosures across the country.

These leaders agree on the total presumption of homeowner innocence. The borrower-as-victim and lender-as-predator storylines are etched in stone. Can’t let reality get in the way of election-year pander-monium.

Click here to continue the opinion piece at KCStar.com. 

I am only going to say that I share this opinion and have been saying so for a year.  Though not as eloquently nor near as succinctly. 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Kansas City: Two States, Two Cities, Much Confusion

Editor’s Note:  I’ve been receiving quite a few more than usual phone calls from out-of-starters regarding Kansas City investment property.  There is always a little confusion as to exactly what is, or more-rather, where is Kansas City.  So I thought I would reprint this from another blog I work on occasionally.  Though I have updated and added a few items. 

***  ***  ***  ***  ***Confusion about Kansas City

People ask me all the time about Kansas City.“So is it in Kansas?  I’ve heard it’s in Missouri.”

Where are the Chiefs and Royals?

In fact, I just received a comment from Bill Roberts as follows;

Chris, I was hoping that you were going to talk about real estate in KC or even that little town in Kansas you call home. No such luck. All you want to do is add to the congestion in the sky. Is that airport you are pushing in Kansas? I heard that Kansas City, Missouri didn’t even have an airport. They use one in the next state over. Is that true?

Bill Roberts

While the words are not always exactly the same…the confusion is.  Kansas City is at the front door of fly-over country and we know it.  So I’m going to try and clear this up a little bit for you and have a little fun at the same time.  As we do, please remember that these two statements about Kansas City are popular and telling:

– It’s a great place to live but I wouldn’t want to vacation there.

and

– They come to Kansas City kicking and screaming and the leave kicking and screaming.

Kansas City mapAs you can see from the map (click on map for larger version) the greater Kansas City area is split in two by a state line.  On the southern part of the map you can see it’s nothing more than a straight line, or more accurately, State Line Rd that divides Kansas City, Missouri from it’s Kansas suburbs of Mission, Prairie Village, Leawood and others. (Much like Western and Eastern and Southern Avenues in Washington, DC.) Literally, on one side of the street you are in Missouri, the other side Kansas.

To the north and then west you can see that it is the Missouri river that divides Kansas from Missouri.  As you will see if you look carefully, the Kansas City airport is actually north of Kansas, not east.

Those are the facts…this is the truth.

Border WarThe facts are that Kansas and Missouri are divided by nothing more than a two lane street or a river no wider than a 100 yards.  The truth of the matter, however, is that the two states couldn’t be more different.  Ask anyone from the area.  Missouri or Kansas.  They’ll all tell you they are from Kansas City.  But at home they are quick to make a distinction between the two states.  And what makes it great is that both sides of the state line knows theirs is the best!  Creates quite a rivalry to this day.

College basketball is full of rivalries.  Duke v Carolina.  Georgetown v Syracuse.  UCLA v USC.  But really, Kansas v Missouri is an actual rivalry.  You see, what other rivalry had folks that shot at each other?!?!  From the very beginning the states were different politically.  Missouri was pro slavery.  Kansas a Free State.  Many a raid was conducted across the border from both states.  The most famous being Quantrill’s raid on Lawrence where the Missourians burned Lawrence, future home of the University of Kansas.

Missouri tends to follow more with the Democratic Party during the elections.  Kansas sides with the Republicans.  Kansas City…on the Missouri side has the amenities big cities want and need:  Stadiums, pro teams, art museums, galleries, urban lifestyle.  Kansas is more suburban.  Allowed to grow wealthy because it’s residents don’t have to support all that infrastructure.

Did you catch that last sentence?  KCMO doesn’t like the Kansas cities because they don’t feel we pay enough in taxes to help them support themselves.  Kansans answer if we wanted to pay for those things we’d live in KCMO.  And besides, the State of Missouri and the city of Kansas City, MO impose an employment tax on those that cross the border.  So we are paying for it.

Now, this is all oversimplified but basically on target.  Kansans stay on the Kansas side when deciding where to live for themselves.  Missourians do the same.  Now as far as real estate investing is concerned I would (and do) invest on either side of the state line because I go where the numbers make sense.

And yes, there is a Kansas City, Kansas as well.  (Look at the map.)  But in general when a person says he’s from Kansas City he could mean anywhere in the area.  For you folks looking in from the outside when you say Kansas City, you probably mean the one in Missouri.

16 Comments

Filed under Kansas City