Monthly Archives: July 2010

HUD Owned Homes Viewings

Yesterday I went out and looked at 13 HUD owned homes that are on “daily bid” status.  I was hoping to turn up one, maybe two possible investment property for Kansas City area real estate investors.  And I did come up with two real good possibles.

Side Note:  It’s amazing how trashed some of these houses can get in just a few short years.  What’s up with that?  🙂

HUD owned homes are purchased a little differently than your regular real estate transaction.  To see more about buying a HUD owned home you can look at a page I wrote on another website title Buying HUD Owned Homes.  Now if you are a primary home buyer you can also take advantage of FHA 203(k) rehab financing.  Sadly, seasoned income property owners know you cannot use the FHA financing for investment properties.

Anyway, one of the homes I identified is located in Kansas City, Missouri.  The other home is located in Shawnee, Kansas.  (Shawnee is a suburb of Kansas City on the Kansas side to the southwest of the city.)

Starting Monday I’m rolling out my new mailing list to people who want to be in the know.  The mailing list will come out 1-4 times a week with foreclosure real estate or other value-oriented REO property where I believe there is money to be made.  To join the list, just click below.

BBQ Captial:  Kansas City real estate investing well done.
Chris Lengquist
Keller Williams Realty
Diamond Partners, Inc
Olathe, Kansas
913.322.7500 o
913.322.7515 d

Leave a comment

Filed under HUD homes, Investment Property

Required Investor Down Payments

Asked around yesterday and today.   Seems the consensus is still 20% down for single family homes and 25% down for multi-family homes.  This is, of course, if you are purchasing investment real estate here in Kansas City.  Not sure what other areas of the country are requiring.  But I would imagine it’s close to the same.

I’m not expecting  a thaw in this anytime soon.

1 Comment

Filed under Financing Options

More Proof That Fannie Mae Just Doesn’t Get It

As if you needed more proof that the people that helped to get us in to our current real estate mess just don’t get it…well, here is a letter from the CEO of Keller Williams Realty to all associates;

Dear Associates –

We’ve recently been alerted to heightened enforcement from Fannie Mae of a per-broker limitation of 30 active REO listings from any one Fannie Mae source, and want to assure you that we have been diligently working behind the scenes on your behalf to address this issue.

While we understand that this policy is designed to curb abuses and ensure that all Fannie Mae-backed REO listings receive the necessary attention to detail, we were quick to point out to Fannie Mae’s leadership that the real estate industry’s most efficient REO specialists have invested heavily in people and systems. As we all know, efficient disposition of REO properties is critical to reestablishing stability within the real estate market, and it serves no one to severely curtail the operations of the most successful producers who understand the high-volume, low-margin nature of the REO business.

We also want to dispel the rumor that the National Association of REALTORS is in support of this limitation. Our sources at NAR have indicated that they share our conviction that top-producing REO agents are an integral part of the solution, and that dismantling their businesses in the interest of opening the field to more players serves no one.

Click here to find the letter that we have sent to the President and CEO of Fannie Mae that outlines our position. We look forward to working closely with Fannie Mae in promoting the highest standards quality and professionalism, and will keep you in the loop as this matter develops.

Yours in leading the way,

Frankly, I have to tell you I was dumbfounded that this rule was even in place!  REOs are low profit, exasperating work.  Professional real estate agents smart enough to put together a team of 3-8 people to review, list and successfully sell foreclosed property have to deal with governmental minions who need to leave by 4:30 each day because they cannot stand to work a minute’s overtime.    Does it occur to Fannie that this is survival of the fittest?

If Fannie Mae doesn’t like how an individual agent or team is doing with their inventory wouldn’t it be better to fire that realtor (and/or team) and hire someone else?  NO!  We just have to make a rule that pertains to everyone.

I know I sound terribly sarcastic at times.  But this is just more proof that Fannie Mae just doesn’t get it.  Perhaps they never will.  I don’t know. 🙂

1 Comment

Filed under Social Issues

FHA 203(k) Success Story in Gardner, Kansas

A great way to purchase a house, put in a little sweat and have some nice equity is with a FHA 203(k) mortgage.  I’ve had the pleasure of helping a few people walk through these and to great success.  Not struggle free, mind you.

On June 22, 2010 I did a little post titled Need To Rehab A Home You Are Purchasing? and one of my customers who went the FHA 203(k) route responded…several times.  At first with challenges.  And then with success.  Just thought you might like to read about it.

Can I help you with a home purchase?  Give me a call at 913.568.1579.  I’d love to help.

Leave a comment

Filed under Financing Options

Current Lending Practices

I received an email from Ellen Young who is a mortgage broker with Bank of America.  Her contact information is 913.940.2900.  Anyway, below is the article she sent dated June 10, 2010 from the Wall Street Journal.

I know some of you wonder about my inconsistent postings these past few months.   But the truth of the matter is that with the current lending practices and my preference towards investment property exchanges there just isn’t really a whole lot of reasons to but forth a lot of effort.  Yes, I’m still working with folks.  But I ask a lot of questions up front to decide if I’ll be compensated on the other side.  Cash buyers and “regular” home buyers seem to be all I’m able scare up these days.

Oh, and the guys that want $1,000,0000 apartment buildings for $500,000.  Give me a break.

***   ***   ****

Borrowers Hit New Home-Loan Hurdles

WSJ June 10, 2010

By JAMES R. HAGERTY And NICK TIMIRAOS

Dennis Davis has a nearly perfect credit score, equity in his home, considerable savings and a solid pension plan. But Mr. Davis recently found that his lender didn’t want to refinance his mortgage.  The problem? Mr. Davis’s income-tax return showed he had taken a loss on an investment he made in a small, family-owned business. That was enough to raise doubts about his otherwise strong financial condition.

Three years after the onset of the mortgage crisis, lenders continue to tighten credit standards. The initial moves were a natural reaction for a business badly burned by rising delinquencies and defaults. But conditions are now so tight that lenders are frustrating borrowers who have enviable financial situations but still can’t easily satisfy lenders’ rigid checklists.

“The pendulum may have swung too far the other way,” Scott Anderson, a senior economist at Wells Fargo Securities, said in a report last month.

Some analysts thought that by this point in the business cycle, lenders would have started to relax credit conditions slightly after clamping down on the risky bubble-era practices. Instead, the screws are still tightening.

That is partly because lenders are taking every precaution to avoid being forced to buy back loans from mortgage investors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the event of default. When a borrower defaults, Fannie and Freddie typically buy the loan out of the mortgage-security pool and pursue a workout or foreclosure. But they can force lenders to repurchase loans when they find flaws in the way they were underwritten. Repurchases were a minor nuisance when defaults were low but have escalated over the past year.

Fannie and Freddie have already tightened their standards: Borrowers with credit scores above 720 accounted for 85% of all loans purchased by Fannie and Freddie last year. But banks are being even more stringent to prevent repurchases and want several years of pay stubs, tax returns and other paperwork from potential borrowers.

During the first quarter of this year, Freddie kicked $1.3 billion in loans back to lenders, up from $800 million during the year-earlier period. At Fannie, repurchase requests jumped to $1.8 billion from $1.1 billion one year earlier.

To be sure, the government has taken steps to keep mortgage spigots open. The Federal Housing Administration allows down payments as low as 3.5%.

Borrowers who have received standard paychecks and have uncomplicated finances generally aren’t getting tripped up. But others face hurdles. Self-employed borrowers, for example, document their incomes with tax returns that include business-related write-offs, which might understate their cash flow.

Such caution is helping to hold down lending despite the lowest interest rates in more than five decades. To revive the economy, “we need the banks back in lending,” said Anthony Sanders, a finance professor at George Mason University. “We’re just kind of stuck in a rut.”

Mr. Davis thought he was exactly the kind of customer lenders love. “I’ve never had a bounced check or a late payment in my life,” Mr. Davis said.

He hoped to lower his interest rate to less than 5% from the current 6% through a refinancing. But his mortgage broker, Steve Walsh of Scout Mortgage in Scottsdale, Ariz., said SunTrust Banks Inc. turned down the application, citing the investment-related loss, which Mr. Davis saw as a minor setback rather than a threat to his financial health. SunTrust said it doesn’t comment on individual borrowers’ situations.

Rather than continuing to shop around for a refinancing, Mr. Davis has decided to cash in some of his investments and pay off the mortgage.

People with complicated financial situations can still find some willing lenders, but “it takes more persistence than most people want to put forth,” said Brian Berg, a loan officer at Priority Financial Network, a Calabasas, Calif., mortgage firm.

Recently, Mr. Berg arranged a refinancing for a borrower with a very high credit score and lots of home equity and debt payments totaling just 19% of pretax income. But Mr. Berg said the lender was worried about a credit report showing a $14 missed payment to a credit-card company in 2001. The lender insisted on proof the money had been paid, which Mr. Berg said was impossible to get.

“Who cares?” he said. “It’s nine years ago, and it’s $14.” He appeased the lender by having the borrower write a $14 check, though no one knew where to send it.

Pete Ogilvie, a mortgage broker in Santa Cruz, Calif., hasn’t found a bank that will refinance a $250,000 loan on a $1 million property for a borrower with more than $200,000 a year in income and a high credit score. Banks balked because the borrower, a technology executive, was out of work for nearly a year starting in 2008. “We’re going to see that for an awful lot of people whose business disappeared unless the banks learn some flexibility,” said Mr. Ogilvie.

In June, Fannie put into effect a “loan-quality initiative” that requires more borrower information to ensure that Fannie ends up buying the same loan that it originally agreed to purchase. The effort has led lenders to pull a second credit report before a loan closes, and brokers say consumers should be very careful not to run up credit-card bills before closing on a mortgage.

“If there are inquiries on your report that you’re shopping for a car, that’s something that has to be answered for,” said Dan Green, a Cincinnati broker. “It can delay a closing and, in some cases, it’ll kill a closing.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Financing Options, Worth Reading