Category Archives: Financing Options

Fannie/Freddie Investment Property Limits Back To 10

I just received this message from a mortgage lender I work with. (She’s pretty darned good, by the way.)  Note that qualifying is pretty restrictive and there will be a full colonoscopy regarding documentation.   But it is definitely a step in the right direction!

***  ***  ****

Provided we have the correct LTV and DTI and an approval through our automated system, your clients are ready to go BUY MORE INVESTMENT PROPERTY!  Just got the message today!!!  We’re back up to 10 as per Fannie / Freddie guidelines.  Spread the word!

I’m off to Maui tomorrow, so holler at me next week with questions!

LTV Restrictions:

Transaction Typehttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif Unitshttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif Maximum
LTV/CLTV/HCLTV*
http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif
Minimum FICO Scorehttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif
Second Home http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif
Purchasehttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 1-Unithttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 75/75/75http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 720http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif
Rate/Term Refinancehttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 1-Unithttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 70/70/70http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 720http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif
Investment Propertyhttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif
Purchasehttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 1-Unithttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 75/75/75http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 720http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif
Rate/Term Refinancehttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 1-Unithttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 70/70/70http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 720http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif
Purchase or Rate/Term Refinancehttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 2-4 Unithttp://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 70/70/70http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif 720http://www.allregs.com/ao/images/gif1.gif

*When the LTV/CLTV/HCLTV differs from the Process/Program selected, the more restrictive applies.

Additional Underwriting Requirements:

No history of bankruptcy or foreclosure within the past 7 years
0x30 in the last 12 months on any mortgage
Rental income from other properties owned by the borrower must be supported by two years federal tax returns. Full documentation must be obtained and DU messages for reduced rental income documentation are not eligible.
4506-T must be executed and IRS copies of the returns or the transcript must be obtained and the underwriter must review the borrower provided tax returns against the information obtained from the execution of the 4506-T prior to full approval.

transparent logo

Audra McMahon

Certified Mortgage Planning Specialist (CMPS)

MY BIO / APPLY NOW:  http://www.getamortgageplan.com/AudraMcMahon.html

TESTIMONIALS:  http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=audrachandler#g/u

FirsTrust Mortgage, Inc

4501 College Blvd, Suite 250A

Leawood, KS 66211

913-747-3279 phone

816-507-6941 cell

913-254-4011 fax

www.getamortgageplan.com

Celebrating 20 years in the mortgage industry!

Listen to the Truth in Lending Show every Sunday at 4pm on 980 KMBZ!

5 Comments

Filed under Financing Options

Response From Fund That Deal

Yesterday I asked if any of you had heard of or worked with FundThatDeal.com.  And no one responded.  I also contacted FundThatDeal.com and they answered back in a timely fashion.  Here is their response.

****

Hi Chris

Thanks for contacting us.

fundthatdeal.com is a new website and has really only gone live in the last month. It took over a year to plan and have it built, as it has a huge engine and back end. This and the marketing to date has required a significant cash investment. So we wona?Tt be going anywhere soon !

The interest we have had from people like yourself has been great. Up to today we have 193 entrepreneurs and 54 investors registered in that short time and more people registering daily. From what we can see there are already a number of dialogues taking place between the various parties and we believe it will not be long before some deals get funded. Like you, we know that there are great real estate deals out there and there are many people who want to earn a decent return on their money.

We charge entrepreneurs $199 to publish a proposal on our site – less than the cost of an advert in a newspaper or on Loopnet – this amount that doesn’t even cover our costs! The entrepreneurs set their own loan/investment terms (which they may or may not decide to negotiate on with an interested investor)

Where we make our money is when people get funded, thata?Ts what the 1% success fee is for a?” so ita?Ts really really important to us that people get funded! However we cannot guarantee everyone will get funded. We can do our best to take the horse to the water but we cana?Tt make it drink! We do know however that the more people we get on the site the greater the chances of funding. So we really appreciate people like you taking an interest in the site.

We are based in Naples, Florida and London, England.

I’ll be sure to give you updates when we get our first deals funded and will gladly forward you references if they’re happy to talk with you.

Dona?Tt hesitate to contact us if you need anything else Chris, and thanks again for reaching out.

2 Comments

Filed under Financing Options

Fund That Deal

So I’m websurfing last night as I usually do and I came across a web site called Fund That Deal.  It looks like one side is for people needing money (real estate investors) and the other side is for people wanting to be private banks.  The site marries the two.

Now I notice for a would-be real estate investor needing a deal there is a one time $199.00 sign up fee and then they charge 1% for putting deals together.  And I assume that’s on top of whatever funding fees the private investors will have.

Anyone have any experience with Fund That Deal?  It sounds promising.  But asking people to throw in $200.00 with such little information seems a bit quirky.  Don’t get me wrong. I’d gladly pay (and recommend people pay) the $199.00 if it actually worked. Heck, it’s a drop in the bucket if everything is legit.

Leave a comment

Filed under Financing Options

I’m Asking You: 15 Years or 30 Years Amortization?

Okay Kansas City real estate investors, I’d love to hear your opinions.  Then I’ll do some math. 

In today’s current economic times and interest rates at record lows for everyone, including real estate investors, do you still go max leverage and amortize the loan over 30 years or do you take a 15 year amortization and smack that principal down as quickly as possible? 

You can email me or post a comment here.  But in any case, I’d love to hear the prevaililng line of thought out there.  Bawldguy, I’m talking to you.  AI – I’m sure you’ll have an opinion.  Let’s get this conversation started.

18 Comments

Filed under Financing Options

Required Investor Down Payments

Asked around yesterday and today.   Seems the consensus is still 20% down for single family homes and 25% down for multi-family homes.  This is, of course, if you are purchasing investment real estate here in Kansas City.  Not sure what other areas of the country are requiring.  But I would imagine it’s close to the same.

I’m not expecting  a thaw in this anytime soon.

1 Comment

Filed under Financing Options

FHA 203(k) Success Story in Gardner, Kansas

A great way to purchase a house, put in a little sweat and have some nice equity is with a FHA 203(k) mortgage.  I’ve had the pleasure of helping a few people walk through these and to great success.  Not struggle free, mind you.

On June 22, 2010 I did a little post titled Need To Rehab A Home You Are Purchasing? and one of my customers who went the FHA 203(k) route responded…several times.  At first with challenges.  And then with success.  Just thought you might like to read about it.

Can I help you with a home purchase?  Give me a call at 913.568.1579.  I’d love to help.

Leave a comment

Filed under Financing Options

Current Lending Practices

I received an email from Ellen Young who is a mortgage broker with Bank of America.  Her contact information is 913.940.2900.  Anyway, below is the article she sent dated June 10, 2010 from the Wall Street Journal.

I know some of you wonder about my inconsistent postings these past few months.   But the truth of the matter is that with the current lending practices and my preference towards investment property exchanges there just isn’t really a whole lot of reasons to but forth a lot of effort.  Yes, I’m still working with folks.  But I ask a lot of questions up front to decide if I’ll be compensated on the other side.  Cash buyers and “regular” home buyers seem to be all I’m able scare up these days.

Oh, and the guys that want $1,000,0000 apartment buildings for $500,000.  Give me a break.

***   ***   ****

Borrowers Hit New Home-Loan Hurdles

WSJ June 10, 2010

By JAMES R. HAGERTY And NICK TIMIRAOS

Dennis Davis has a nearly perfect credit score, equity in his home, considerable savings and a solid pension plan. But Mr. Davis recently found that his lender didn’t want to refinance his mortgage.  The problem? Mr. Davis’s income-tax return showed he had taken a loss on an investment he made in a small, family-owned business. That was enough to raise doubts about his otherwise strong financial condition.

Three years after the onset of the mortgage crisis, lenders continue to tighten credit standards. The initial moves were a natural reaction for a business badly burned by rising delinquencies and defaults. But conditions are now so tight that lenders are frustrating borrowers who have enviable financial situations but still can’t easily satisfy lenders’ rigid checklists.

“The pendulum may have swung too far the other way,” Scott Anderson, a senior economist at Wells Fargo Securities, said in a report last month.

Some analysts thought that by this point in the business cycle, lenders would have started to relax credit conditions slightly after clamping down on the risky bubble-era practices. Instead, the screws are still tightening.

That is partly because lenders are taking every precaution to avoid being forced to buy back loans from mortgage investors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the event of default. When a borrower defaults, Fannie and Freddie typically buy the loan out of the mortgage-security pool and pursue a workout or foreclosure. But they can force lenders to repurchase loans when they find flaws in the way they were underwritten. Repurchases were a minor nuisance when defaults were low but have escalated over the past year.

Fannie and Freddie have already tightened their standards: Borrowers with credit scores above 720 accounted for 85% of all loans purchased by Fannie and Freddie last year. But banks are being even more stringent to prevent repurchases and want several years of pay stubs, tax returns and other paperwork from potential borrowers.

During the first quarter of this year, Freddie kicked $1.3 billion in loans back to lenders, up from $800 million during the year-earlier period. At Fannie, repurchase requests jumped to $1.8 billion from $1.1 billion one year earlier.

To be sure, the government has taken steps to keep mortgage spigots open. The Federal Housing Administration allows down payments as low as 3.5%.

Borrowers who have received standard paychecks and have uncomplicated finances generally aren’t getting tripped up. But others face hurdles. Self-employed borrowers, for example, document their incomes with tax returns that include business-related write-offs, which might understate their cash flow.

Such caution is helping to hold down lending despite the lowest interest rates in more than five decades. To revive the economy, “we need the banks back in lending,” said Anthony Sanders, a finance professor at George Mason University. “We’re just kind of stuck in a rut.”

Mr. Davis thought he was exactly the kind of customer lenders love. “I’ve never had a bounced check or a late payment in my life,” Mr. Davis said.

He hoped to lower his interest rate to less than 5% from the current 6% through a refinancing. But his mortgage broker, Steve Walsh of Scout Mortgage in Scottsdale, Ariz., said SunTrust Banks Inc. turned down the application, citing the investment-related loss, which Mr. Davis saw as a minor setback rather than a threat to his financial health. SunTrust said it doesn’t comment on individual borrowers’ situations.

Rather than continuing to shop around for a refinancing, Mr. Davis has decided to cash in some of his investments and pay off the mortgage.

People with complicated financial situations can still find some willing lenders, but “it takes more persistence than most people want to put forth,” said Brian Berg, a loan officer at Priority Financial Network, a Calabasas, Calif., mortgage firm.

Recently, Mr. Berg arranged a refinancing for a borrower with a very high credit score and lots of home equity and debt payments totaling just 19% of pretax income. But Mr. Berg said the lender was worried about a credit report showing a $14 missed payment to a credit-card company in 2001. The lender insisted on proof the money had been paid, which Mr. Berg said was impossible to get.

“Who cares?” he said. “It’s nine years ago, and it’s $14.” He appeased the lender by having the borrower write a $14 check, though no one knew where to send it.

Pete Ogilvie, a mortgage broker in Santa Cruz, Calif., hasn’t found a bank that will refinance a $250,000 loan on a $1 million property for a borrower with more than $200,000 a year in income and a high credit score. Banks balked because the borrower, a technology executive, was out of work for nearly a year starting in 2008. “We’re going to see that for an awful lot of people whose business disappeared unless the banks learn some flexibility,” said Mr. Ogilvie.

In June, Fannie put into effect a “loan-quality initiative” that requires more borrower information to ensure that Fannie ends up buying the same loan that it originally agreed to purchase. The effort has led lenders to pull a second credit report before a loan closes, and brokers say consumers should be very careful not to run up credit-card bills before closing on a mortgage.

“If there are inquiries on your report that you’re shopping for a car, that’s something that has to be answered for,” said Dan Green, a Cincinnati broker. “It can delay a closing and, in some cases, it’ll kill a closing.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Financing Options, Worth Reading