Category Archives: Misc. Real Estate

News You Can Use

Midwest Airlines is being taken over by Air-Tran. As a Kansas Citian, this isn’t good news. Midwest has been a good civic partner for Kansas City. Air-Tran? Can you say Southwest Airlines without any of the status?

***

The foreclosure market is at historic levels, on the high side. And look which states are causing the problem. We have quite a few here, but we are in much better shape in the Greater Kansas City area.

***

Hey St. Louis, I thought your baseball team was supposed to be better than ours. Kind of reminds me of 1985. 🙂

***
Congratulations to Jacque Vaughn of the San Antonio Spurs. Another Jayhawk gets a ring. I know Kansas has had Clyde Lovellette,Wilt Chamberlin, JoJo White, Darnell Valentine, Danny Manning, Paul Pierce, Kirk Hinrich and so many more. But Jacque Vaughn will always be my favorite point guard. A pure point guard and a perfect NBA backup. Plays 10-11 minutes a game without turnovers but with assists. What else could a coach ask for?

***

***

Newsflash. Slower sales mean higher commissions to your real estate agent. Why is this a surprise? When all you had to do to sell a home was put out a sign and wait 72 hours of course commission rates for real estate agents was going to drop. But now, when sales are slower and it takes a professional to get the word out about your home, of course commission rates are going to rise.

Why do people not think economic theory applies also to real estate? Same with the whole rising prices thing. Didn’t we see this story a few years ago with the stock market? Learn people. Learn.

Leave a comment

Filed under Kansas City, Kansas City Sports, Misc. Real Estate

New Real Estate Links

Today I’m adding two very worthy sites to my Real Estate Links section. You’ll want to add these to your reading.

RE Agent in Connecticut aka The Sock Puppet

REALTOR GENIUS

7 Comments

Filed under Misc. Real Estate

Should A Real Estate Investor Get Their Real Estate License?

I received a question by email the other day that I get asked about 6-8 times per year.

“Should I, as a real estate investor, get my real estate license?”

Let me just begin this post by saying that I am not a substitute for sound legal advice. (Does that make you think the answer could really matter?) When you get your real estate license there are certain legal obligations you have to fulfill. So before making a final decision feel free to contact your real estate attorney.

Advantages

  1. Certainly, as a real estate agent you can get first crack at quite a few properties. Once you learn how the MLS system works you can set up searches that allow you to monitor for homes that fit your criteria.
  2. People know you are “in the game.”
  3. Access to Board approved real estate contracts.
  4. You can save or earn a commission on deals that would otherwise go to the agent involved.

Disadvantages

  1. As a state licensed real estate agent you are now held to a “higher” standard. You have laws to comply with and the Code of Ethics to follow.
  2. You must notify any buyer and seller you are working with that you are a licensed real estate agent.
  3. If it ever went this far, who do you think a jury would side with? The person who ended up selling their home at a deep discount or the licensed real estate agent who knew the true value of that home that was for sale?

Generally, I tend to recommend to people to NOT get their real estate license if they are going to be a full time real estate investor. I believe the liabilities and compliance issues outweigh the benefit of saving the occasional commission.

Having said all of that, there is absolutely nothing wrong with being a real estate agent who also owns investment property. For instance, the investment property I own is for my security and my benefit. It is not, at this time anyway, my primary source of income. It is my nest egg and wealth growing vehicle.

So ask yourself: What will my point of emphasis be if I get my license?

4 Comments

Filed under Misc. Real Estate, Real Estate Investing

Negotiating Real Estate Purchases

There are many, many schools of thought when it comes to negotiating for a property. And I have to point out that the schools can differ widely when it comes to negotiating for a personal home versus and income property.

For investment real estate purposes, I recommend using time as your friend. Especially in this market. Let me explain.

First, you are trying to purchase a future. Not a house. You are buying this rental home because you believe it will help you retire in comfort. Not because you need something to do on weekends. So the first item of business it to come up with an offer price and a walk-away price. A price you will not exceed because the property won’t be profitable “enough” (whatever that is) for you.

Then, when you make your offer you need not be in a hurry to end the process. If you’ve offered low enough you will invite a counter offer to see how far the seller is willing to move. But don’t offer too low as I’ve talked about that here. Anyway, I always like to let the seller stew over night…or even over two nights. I want him to know that he has a viable buyer on the line and that he might let him go if he’s not careful. And if he is countering over your walk-away price I want him to know that you are walking away. You would be surprised how flexible a seller can be once a buyer has walked.

I’m not going to go into the complete psychology of this. I’m not really qualified. I can tell you that it works more often than not. But you do HAVE to be willing to walk away and look for another property. It’s the only way it will work. Because remember, the seller (also an investor) has experience at this, too.

Leave a comment

Filed under Misc. Real Estate

Missouri Finally Gets It

Congratulations Missouri. You are finally getting the message. Today’s Kansas City Star reports that the state of Missouri is forming a special task force to help root out mortgage fraud. Even though Kansas City is somewhere around the 26th largest market in the country we have the 6th highest rate of mortgage fraud. Don’t believe me? Visit Mortgage Fraud Blog and look at the entries for the Kansas City area. Real estate and mortgage fraud is and has been a problem here for quite a while.

Here’s an idea. Require licensing for the mortgage brokers. Kansas does. You require licensing for the real estate agents. It’s really ridiculous that a crook can lose his license in Kansas and move his office 4 miles to the east and re-open with no oversight.

Leave a comment

Filed under Kansas City Real Estate, Misc. Real Estate

Seller’s Agent in Kansas: Who Does My Agent Represent?

Earlier I posted on what a Buyer’s Agent is, or is supposed to be. Today I want to go after Seller’s Agency. Probably the most abused agency, in my opinion. Again, let’s see what the State of Kansas has to say about what the duties of a Seller’s Agent are.

SELLER’S AGENT

The seller’s agent represents the seller only, so the buyer may be either unrepresented or represented by another agent.

The seller’s agent is responsible for performing the following duties:

· promoting the interests of the seller with the utmost good faith, loyalty, and fidelity
· protecting the seller’s confidences, unless disclosure is required
· presenting all offers in a timely manner
· advising the seller to obtain expert advice
· accounting for all money and property received
· disclosing to the seller all adverse material facts about the buyer that the agent knows
· disclosing to the buyer all adverse material facts actually known by the agent, including the following:
Ø environmental hazards affecting the property that are required to be disclosed
Ø the physical condition of the property
Ø any material defects in the property or in the title to the property
Ø any material limitation on the seller’s ability to complete the contract.

The seller’s agent has no duty to:

· conduct an independent inspection of the property for the benefit of the buyer
· independently verify the accuracy or completeness of any statement by the seller or any qualified third party.

The matter seems pretty self explanatory. Where I see it run in to trouble is on the every day application. You see, many a real estate agent out there gets so excited when they receive a call off of one of their signs or ads that they will readily throw their Seller under the bus in the wink of an eye. Forgetting that they (the agent) signed an Exclusive Right To Sell Agreement with the Seller when the house is listed they immediately will want to buddy up to the caller, answer all of their questions and have a great chance of either obtaining the caller as a new Buyer to work with, or better yet, selling the home they called about and thus earning both sides of the commission.

Now, stop just for a second. It’s okay to to assist a Buyer and a Seller in the sale of a home. It’s called being a Transaction Broker in Kansas. And it will be discussed in the next post. What is not okay is violating agency to do it.

When a sign call turns into a possible Buyer off the house they called about, it is most likely that they are an Unrepresented Buyer. For example, If Buyer A calls me about my listing at 123 Main Street and I disclose that I am a Seller’s agent and they see the home with me and then make an offer with me and then close on the house with me it is almost certain that they were unrepresented throughout the entire process.

Make no mistake, I still have to treat them honestly, help them fill out the paperwork, disclose any defects in the property I am aware of, etc. But at no time am I trying to help them negotiate, disclosing that the Seller would take less for the property, etc. I cannot mislead them. I just can’t advise them to my Seller’s detriment.

So Sellers, make sure your agent isn’t acting as a Secret Agent. Are they disclosing to their sign calls/ad calls/board calls that they are YOUR agent? Or are they signing a Buyer’s Agency Agreement with them as soon as they get done showing them your house so that they can immediately flip them and you into a Transaction Brokerage Agreement to make their job easier.
You see, they are probably afraid that when they tell the potential Buyer that on this house and this transaction that they would be the Seller’s agent. They are afraid the Buyer will go off and find another agent to represent them. They are afraid they have done all the work and won’t get paid for it. It never occurs to them to treat the Buyer like a grown-up. To explain the facts to them. And hey, if they want their own representation they are entitled to it. The agent doesn’t have to pay their representation, but they are entitled to it.
Is this clear as mud? Great. Be sure to email or call with any questions.

Leave a comment

Filed under Kansas City Real Estate, Misc. Real Estate

Kansas Buyer’s Agent: Real Estate 101

One of the most confusing things for most people to understand is who exactly a real estate agent is working for when they are buying or selling a home. Each state has their own particular rules regarding real estate transactions. For instance, I am licensed in the states of Kansas and Missouri. (For those of you not intimately familiar with the area the city is split in two by a road called State Line. On one side is Kansas. The other Missouri. Kind of like Western & Eastern Avenues in Washington, DC and Maryland.) Both states have their own set of rules and I have to adapt as I move from one state to the other.

Today I want to talk about Kansas. It is my home state! And in Kansas a real estate agent can represent you in one of three ways. You can download the brochure to get your own copy of the three. (You can also be unrepresented, that’s a whole other subject.) There is Seller’s Agency, Buyer’s Agency and Transaction Broker status. Over the course of this week I will discuss all three in detail. Today we will start with what you should be getting from a Buyer’s Agent.

The State of Kansas says:

BUYER’S AGENT

The buyer’s agent represents the buyer only, so the seller may be either unrepresented or represented by another agent.

The buyer’s agent is responsible for performing the following duties:

· promoting the interests of the buyer with the utmost good faith, loyalty and fidelity
· protecting the buyer’s confidences, unless disclosure is required
· presenting all offers in a timely manner
· advising the buyer to obtain expert advice
· accounting for all money and property received
· disclosing to the buyer all adverse material facts that the agency knows
· disclosing to the seller all adverse material facts actually known by the agent, including all material facts concerning the buyer’s financial ability to perform the terms of the transaction.

The buyer’s agent has no duty to:

· conduct an independent investigation of the buyer’s financial condition for the benefit of the seller
· independently verify the accuracy or completeness of statements made by the buyer or any qualified third party.

In short, the Buyer’s Agent is looking out for the Buyer’s best interest. Let me give you an example; REALTOR A has been working with Buyer A under an Exclusive Buyer’s Agency Agreement and Buyer A decides there is a For Sale By Owner they want to check out. (Another term, more correct, for FSBO is Unrepresented Seller.) So REALTOR A gives the Unrepresented Seller a call and identifies himself, his agency and his purpose of the call which is to set up an appointment. The Unrepresented Seller then decides he/she will work with the Buyer’s Agent and they work out a commission agreement before showing the home…in writing. During the course of these conversations the Seller says to the Buyer’s Agent, after having been told the Seller will be unrepresented, that the sales price is $100,000 but that they would take $97,500 for the house.

The house is shown to Buyer A and they love it. They decided to make an offer on the home of $99,000 because they really do not want to lose the house. Should the Buyer’s Agent:

  1. Write the offer for $99,000 because he will get a slightly higher commission?
  2. Keep the Seller’s $97,500 number private since the Seller told him in confidence?
  3. Advise the Buyer that the Seller confided in him that he/she would sell the home for $97,500?

I’ll await your answers… You can contact me by clicking on “comments” below or through the new feature of the IM by Meebo on the right column. The IM is already proving to be very popular.

2 Comments

Filed under Kansas City Real Estate, Misc. Real Estate